Design and Implementation of a GSM-based IoT Smart Safety  
Helmet for Construction Workers  
C.K.P. Chandrasena  
Department of Electronics, Wayamba University of Sri Lanka, Kuliyapitiya, Sri Lanka  
Received: 25 December 2025; Accepted: 31 December 2025; Published: 15 January 2026  
ABSTRACT  
The construction industry is recognized as one of the most hazardous occupational sectors, particularly in  
developing countries, where workplace accidents frequently result in serious injuries and fatalities. Falls from  
height, exposure to toxic gases, extreme environmental conditions, and inadequate supervision at remote sites  
are among the most common risks faced by construction workers. In most cases, personal protective equipment  
offered is usually inadequate, especially in the case of remote locations where construction supervision is not  
available. In light of these issues, this study proposes an IoT-based smart safety helmet intended for construction  
workers. The proposed system is designed with the ESP32 microcontroller as its core combining several sensors,  
such as the MPU6050 accelerator and gyroscope to identify falls, the DHT22 sensor to monitor temperature and  
humidity, the MQ-2 gas sensor to detect hazardous gases, and the NEO-6M GPS module to track real-time  
location. Remote construction sites are often devoid of Wi-Fi or cloud service and the proposed system relies on  
a GSM module for data transmission. The sensor data are sent to a web dashboard in ThingSpeak, based on the  
HTTP protocols, and the critical conditions cause the multi-channel alerts with the use of the onboard buzzer,  
dashboard notifications, and SMS messages to site managers. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed  
helmet provides accurate real-time monitoring and dependable data transmission. The design of the helmet  
enhances its practicality and efficiency, especially in construction settings where workplace hazards and the risk  
of accidents are prevalent by merging low-cost, lightweight, and dependable communication technologies.  
Keywords: IoT, Smart Safety Helmet, Construction Worker Safety, GSM Communication, Real-Time  
Monitoring  
INTRODUCTION  
A developing country such as Sri Lanka depends on the construction industry as one of the key economic growth  
drivers. Conversely, it has been identified as one of the riskiest industries in many countries worldwide, with a  
massive number of occupational accidents, injuries, and deaths. Construction site workers must perform various  
tasks that can involve multiple risks such as falling objects, slipping down a higher elevation, breathing of toxic  
gases and exposure to extreme temperatures. Falls from height were the most prevalent form of accidents that  
took place at construction sites in Sri Lanka, and this form of accident made up about 22% of the on-the-job  
accidents experienced by the construction workers [1]. Beyond this, 17% of accidents have occurred due to  
falling debris or objects [1,2]. The data showed that 13% of the incidents were located in the categories of the  
machinery accidents and the electrocution [1,2]. Moreover, among all incidents that occurred on Sri Lankan  
construction sites during the last decade, 11%, 7%, and 6% were the results of being caught between objects,  
slips/trips and falls, and fire and explosions, respectively [1,2]. Therefore, the most critical issues on a  
construction site are safety to eliminate numerous accidents that can lead to the loss of priceless lives and severe  
injuries. Nonetheless, the majority of accidents are associated with inadequate use of personal protective  
equipment and reliance on low-quality equipment. Additionally, there is no effective monitoring mechanism at  
the time of a possible accident at most sites. Therefore, it is highly essential to provide appropriate protective  
equipment to the workers of the sites as well as to secure the hazardous events detecting mechanism in real time,  
ensuring the safety of the workers.  
Page 560  
Most of the existing systems are based on AI-powered systems or IoT cloud platforms [3,4]. However, they are  
powerful and not suited to a resource constrained environment since they need more expensive costs, access to  
the internet, and consume more power. The other reason makes use of short-range communication units like the  
RF and HC12 that limit the reach and are likely to interfere with within the complicated site environment [5,6].  
Helmets for mining purposes have convenient gas and temperature measurements but are heavily dependent on  
clouds and generally lack some features like fall or impact detection [7]. Similar to smart helmets with Wi-Fi  
and LoRa connectivity, the topic of which has received significant research interest, their application in the  
context of construction is severely lacking. The Wi-Fi systems depend on the unending internet connection that  
is never possible in temporary or remote construction sites [8]. Although LoRa systems provide extended  
communication ranges and low interference in high-density environments, their low data rates and high latency  
limit their suitability for real-time applications in construction sites [9]. Although cheap and effective, Bluetooth  
systems can only offer low bit rate and limited range and hence they are useless to construction sites [10]. All  
these lack identification of the issue why most of the designs cannot provide the correct coverage with low  
latency to be safe in the construction sites. The proposed system is unique with a GSM based method of  
communication unlike the available smart helmets. This can be applied in construction sites where there is no  
possibility of having stable Wi-Fi or cloud connection.  
To address these challenges, this study proposes an IoT enabled smart safety helmet utilizing GSM based  
communication to ensure reliable data transmission in remote environments. The system focuses on real-time  
environmental monitoring, fall detection, and location tracking, enabling rapid response to hazardous events and  
improving overall worker safety.  
SYSTEM DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY  
Block diagram of the design  
The functional block diagram of the system is shown in Figure 1.  
Figure 1: Block diagram of the system  
The system introduces a gyroscope and accelerometer to detect sudden falls or impacts, a GPS module for real-  
time worker location tracking to identify the location when a sudden emergency occurs [11,12]. Temperature,  
humidity, and certain flammable gases are monitored and measured using environmental sensors [13,14]. In this  
system, the microcontroller acts as the central processing unit for the data collected from the sensors [15]. It  
manages the control logic, processes sensor data, and interfaces with the other system elements through  
command messaging. A GSM module is used for continuous data transmission to site managers. This ensures  
that the data coming from sensors on the helmet continuously reaches the control center in very remote or less  
developed areas. The SIM800L module is powered by a 3.7 V battery, while the rest of the system is powered  
separately by another 3.7 V battery.  
Page 561  
Circuit diagram  
The development of the smart helmet system integrated sensing, processing, communication, and power modules  
into a single, compact, and wearable platform. ESP 32 was selected as the microcontroller to coordinate all  
system operations. MQ2 gas sensor, NEO-6M GPS module, Buzzer module, DHT 22 temperature and humidity  
sensor, MPU6050 gyroscope and accelerometer sensor, SIM800L GSM/GPRS module with antenna were used  
as the sensor modules for the smart safety helmet. A 2 A-rated LM2596 DC-DC buck converter was used to  
provide a stable 4 V output with a current capacity of up to 2 A[16]. Figure 2 below illustrates the circuit diagram  
of the system.  
Figure 2:Circuit diagram of the system  
The circuit diagram was implemented in a dot-board as shown in Figure 3.  
Figure 3: Prototype implementation of the circuit on a dot board  
Page 562  
Web Dashboard and Cloud Integration  
The proposed smart safety helmet integrates with a web-based dashboard hosted on the ThingSpeak IoT  
platform, as shown in Figure 4, enabling real-time monitoring of worker safety. Sensor data including fall  
detection status, environmental parameters such as temperature, humidity, and gas concentration, and GPS  
location are transmitted via the ESP32 microcontroller using HTTP POST requests through the GSM module,  
ensuring reliable operation even in remote construction sites without Wi-Fi.  
Figure 4:User sensor data view displaying temperature, humidity, gas levels, location view and fall detection  
alerts.  
The dashboard displays environmental data through charts and gauges, while GPS coordinates allow real-time  
worker tracking. Critical events such as falls or hazardous environmental conditions trigger multi-channel alerts:  
an on-board buzzer, SMS notifications to site managers, and dashboard notifications indicating the worker’s  
status and location. This integration provides timely hazard reporting, historical data storage for safety analysis,  
and potential scalability for advanced analytics and alerting systems.  
Calibration and Detection Algorithms  
Fall detection can be calculated through a combination of acceleration magnitude and tilt angle analysis. The  
total acceleration was calculated as:  
푚  
=
2 + 푎2 + 푎2 -------- [1]  
where ; Am = Total acceleration  
ax = Acceleration along the x axis  
ay =Acceleration along the y axis  
az = Acceleration along the z axis  
Page 563  
A fall event was identified when the following conditions were simultaneously satisfied: (i) the total acceleration  
exceeded 2.5ꢀg within a 300ꢀms interval, and (ii) the MPU6050 gyroscope recorded a tilt angle greater than 150°,  
indicating full inversion. These dual conditions were applied to minimize false positives.  
Environmental sensors were calibrated using standard smartphone sensors as references. Hazardous conditions  
were defined as temperatures above 40ꢀ°C, relative humidity exceeding 85%, and gas concentrations greater than  
250ꢀppm. The GPS module’s performance was validated against smartphone geolocation data, with positional  
accuracy measured in meters.  
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION  
Sensor data analysis  
All modules were tested individually and compared with corresponding smartphone sensor readings. GPS and  
environmental sensor validation is shown in Table 1.  
Table 1: Environmental and GPS Sensor Accuracy  
Parameter  
Temperature (°C)  
Humidity (%)  
Sensor Value  
37.0  
Smartphone Value  
Accuracy (%)  
36.5  
80  
98.6  
96.3  
93.8  
83  
GPS Error (m)  
±3.2  
±3.0  
The results of fall detection are summarized in Table 2.  
Table 2: Fall Detection Performance  
Test Condition  
Drop from 1.0 m (upright)  
Drop from 1.5 m (side)  
Sudden head tilt only  
Running motion  
Acceleration (g)  
2.8  
Tilt Angle (°)  
Detected Fall  
Correct Detection (%)  
160  
170  
120  
<150  
Yes  
Yes  
No  
95  
96  
3.1  
1.4  
2.2  
No  
The system was initially tested in relatively controlled conditions that replications of real life and a realistic test  
was done to examine the performance of the system before its implementation in an actual construction setting.  
Each sensor was taken against the relevant benchmarks. For example, the DHT22 temperature and humidity  
sensor was validated using real-time weather data obtained from a smartphone weather application, whereas the  
MQ-2 gas sensor was tested under controlled conditions using liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) sourced from a  
lighter. The accelerometer-based fall detection system was tested using simulated controlled falls of different  
heights, and location tracking was tested at an open and partially covered location. It was also confirmed that  
the system had the capability of real-time transfer of data to the ThingSpeak cloud. The current prototype  
achieved approximately three hours of continuous operation using a single 3.7 V lithium-ion battery. While  
sufficient for proof-of-concept validation, this duration is not adequate for full construction shifts. Future work  
will incorporate power optimization techniques such as duty cycling, deep sleep modes of the ESP32, adaptive  
sensor sampling, and reduced GSM transmission frequency to significantly extend battery life. The extra weight  
of about 150 g of the electronic components was not deemed to be problematic since that weight did not have  
significant influence on the comfort of the users. The prototype IoT-based smart safety helmet, presented in  
Figure 5 was made possible by incorporating these sensors and modules into a small design.  
Page 564  
Figure 5:Final design of the system  
The experimental validation of the proposed system was conducted under controlled and semi-field conditions  
with a limited number of participants. Although the results demonstrate reliable sensing and communication  
performance, large-scale field testing involving a greater number of construction workers and diverse site  
conditions is required to achieve higher statistical significance. This will be addressed in future deployments of  
the system.  
Web application results and usability evaluation  
Figure 6 illustrates the web-based IoT device management dashboard displaying real-time sensor data and hazard  
alerts.  
Figure 6:Web dashboard pop-up alert showing hazardous event details for timely user response.  
Page 565  
The created web application was able to interact with ThingSpeak to deliver real-time monitoring and hazard  
alerts. The application enabled workers to enroll in the system and the site managers could view several workers  
at the same time via the administrative dashboard. Access to a registered worker’s dashboard was also granted  
to their respective family members. Two participants were involved in the usability test to determine the level of  
ease of use and to confirm the user-friendly nature of the system. These findings revealed that the web application  
was successful in the usability test and provided an easily accessible platform on which the safety monitoring  
could be performed.  
CONCLUSION  
The study aimed to develop and introduce a smart safety helmet that has the ability to record environmental and  
activity-based parameters, which apply to the safety of construction workers. The prototype used several sensors  
as DHT22 temperature and humidity sensor, MQ-2 gas sensor, MPU6050 accelerating sensor, and GPS module.  
A GSM module was used to transmit data to the cloud, and ThingSpeak platforms were used to visualize the  
data. It also created a web application that helped the site managers and the family members to receive real-time  
information and hazard alerts. The system was tested in a semi-field environment to verify its functionality and  
performance. The prototype achieved its functions successfully and this was confirmed by the results of the  
experiment. The temperature sensor and the humidity sensor have been found accurate with acceptable error  
margins, and the gas sensor effectively responded to dangerous gas levels and gave alerts when the threshold  
was crossed. The fall detection system which used the accelerators was reliable in detecting falls and reducing  
false alarms. GPS tracking was useful in open places, but the accuracy deteriorated in partially covered areas. It  
was also observed that the GSM module was efficient in real-time data transfer with insignificant latency and  
acceptable loss of packets in weak signal areas. The web application has provided a convenient interface to the  
different stakeholders, which fosters situational knowledge and accessibility. Overall, this research contributes  
to the field by integrating multiple sensing, communication, and monitoring features into a single wearable  
device, offering a more comprehensive safety solution than conventional helmets, which typically monitor only  
a single parameter.  
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT  
The author would like to express sincere gratitude and appreciation to academic and other staff of the Department  
of Electronics, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Wayamba University of Sri Lanka for the support provided during  
the study.  
REFERENCES  
1. Wijesekara, M., Fernando, P., & Gunarathna, N. (2022). Causes for death and injuries in construction  
industry in Sri Lanka. Proceedings of the SLIIT International Conference on Engineering and  
2. Rameezdeen, R., Pathirage, C., & Weerasooriya, S. (2006). Study of construction accidents in Sri Lanka.  
Built-Environment Sri Lanka, 4(1), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.4038/besl.v4i1.7650  
3. Narayan, N., Dadhania, K., & Somavanshi, B. (2021). IoT-based smart helmet for industrial workers  
(B.Tech project report). Vellore Institute of Technology, India.  
4. Campero-Jurado, I., Márquez-Sánchez, S., Quintanar-Gómez, J., Rodríguez, S., & Corchado, J. (2020).  
Smart Helmet 5.0 for industrial internet of things using artificial intelligence. Sensors, 20(21), 6241.  
5. P, D., T, G., V, G., & Y, S. V. (2020). Smart Safety Helmet for Bike Riders using IoT. International  
Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Technovation, 21–30. https://doi.org/10.34256/irjmt2044  
6. Kuhar, P., Sharma, K., Hooda, Y., & Verma, N. K. (2021). Internet of Things (IoT) based Smart Helmet  
for Construction. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1950(1), 012075. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-  
7. Mali, N. P. Y., Sawant, N. N., Patil, N. S., Kumari, N. S., & Kumari, N. S. (2023). Smart helmet for coal  
mining. International Journal of Advanced Research in Science Communication and Technology, 17–23.  
Page 566  
8. Kim, Y., & Choi, Y. (2022). Smart Helmet-Based proximity Warning system to improve occupational  
safety on the road using image sensor and artificial intelligence. International Journal of Environmental  
Research and Public Health, 19(23), 16312. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316312  
9. Kumar, G. S. A., Singh, R., Gehlot, A., & Akram, S. V. (2022). LoRa enabled Real-time Monitoring of  
Workers in Building Construction Site. International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Research,  
10. Seo, K.-B., Min, S. D., Lee, S. H., & Hong, M. (2019). Design and implementation of construction site  
safety management system using smart helmet and BLE beacons. Journal of Internet Computing and  
11. Alnasef,  
12. Sobhana, S., Sowmeeya, S. R., Srinathji, M., & Tamilselvan, S. (2021). Smart helmet. IOP Conference  
Series Materials Science and Engineering, 1084(1), 012116. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-  
13. Long, K. (2024). Advancements in environmental sensor Technology: analysis, applications, and future  
prospects. Highlights in Science Engineering and Technology, 97, 21–28.  
A.  
(2023).  
Embedded  
fall  
detection  
system  
using  
deep  
learning.  
14. Khan, M. N., Rahman, Z., Chowdhury, S. S., Tanvirahmedshuvo, Ontor, M. R. H., Hossen, M. D., Khan,  
N., & Rahman, H. (2024). Real-Time Environmental Monitoring Using Low-Cost Sensors in Smart  
Cities  
with  
IoT.  
International  
Journal  
for  
Multidisciplinary  
Research,  
6(1).  
15. Maier, A., Sharp, A., & Vagapov, Y. (2017). Comparative analysis and practical implementation of the  
ESP32 microcontroller module for the Internet of Things. In Proceedings of the 2017 Internet  
Technologies and Applications (ITA) (pp. 143–148). https://doi.org/10.1109/ITECHA.2017.8101926  
16. Tjukovs, S., Surmacs, D., Grizans, J., Iheanacho, C. V., & Pikulins, D. (2023). Implementation of BuCK  
DC-DC Converter as Built-In Chaos Generator for Secure IoT. Electronics, 13(1), 20.  
Page 567