the Ministry of Health in 2007; 2)
Implementation of an integrated online data communication network between 90% of district/city health
offices, 100% of provincial health offices, 100% of central hospitals, 100% of Central Technical
Implementation Units (UPT) and the Ministry of Health in 2009; 3) The implementation of an integrated
online data communication network between all district/city health offices, provincial health offices, central
hospitals, and central UPTs with the Ministry of Health in 2010.
However, the information system that has been run so far is still manual in the health sector even though the
legislation in the health sector has required the use of SIK Online. As a result, health data at the regional level
is separate, resulting in overlap, duplication of data, difficult access to data, and inadequate data integration.
This causes problems for decision-makers based on existing facts (evidance-based) such as policies that are
made so that they are not on target because the data is not in accordance with the actual situation. Based on
data from the Ministry of Health In 2007, the Data and Information Center has evaluated SIK using the Health
Metrics Network-World Health Organization (HMN-WHO) tool. This evaluation includes 6 main components
of SIK, namely resources (including management and resources), indicators, data sources, data management
(data collection; data processing and analysis), data quality, data dissemination and use.
The results obtained were "there but not enough" for resources (47%), indicators (61%), data sources (51%),
data quality (55%), data use and dissemination (57%) and "not adequate at all for data management (35%). In
general, these results show that the overall SIK is still in the status of "There but not adequat" and still needs to
be improved. Since the implementation of decentralization in 2004, quite a number of health centers, hospitals,
district/city offices and provincial offices have invested funds in efforts to modernize SIK with the use of TIK
without any guidelines or guidelines. As a result, there are currently several Regency/City Health Offices that
have different application software in terms of data, structure, and functions collected so that the data cannot
be recapitulated at the provincial level because the software cannot communicate. The lack of competent
human resources in SIK management is also a factor that results in the weakness of SIK, especially in terms of
data management. The number of human resources available in the field is still insufficient when compared to
the number of initiatives to strengthen SIK manually or computerized.
The Gowa Regency Health Office has implemented the Regional Health Information System (SIKDA) whose
use has been carried out since September 2018 and is the first district to implement Sikda in South Sulawesi
Province. This Sikda is directly connected to the IT network of the Gowa Health Office so that it can easily
directly monitor the condition of services in each health center, even though only 15 health centers treat Sikda
because the 15 health centers are low-lying health centers that can be connected to the network provided by
the health office from 26 health centers in Gowa Regency. Regarding human resources in the IT department,
there is still a need for personnel who have the ability and expertise to operate Sikda online. The Gowa
Regency Health Office has recruited through a two-day training with direct trainers from the Pusdatin of the
Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia.
METHODOLOGY
This type of research is qualitative, namely to explore information in depth by making observations about the
implementation of online health information systems in increasing work effectiveness at the Gowa Regency
Health Office. This research was carried out at the Gowa Regency Health Office and the South Sulawesi
Provincial Health Office. The informants in this study consisted of 7 informants, namely 5 ordinary informants
were the Head of the Planning Section, the Planning Subdivision totaling 1 person, the Staff in charge of the
Planning Section totaling 2 people, the program and health information staff totaling 1 person at the Gowa
Regency Health Office, and 2 key informants (Head of the Planning Program Subdivision of the Gowa
Regency Health Office and the Head of Planning Subdivision of the South Sulawesi Provincial Health Office).
The data collection techniques used are observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation. The data sources
in this study are primary data obtained through in-depth interviews and observations, and secondary data come
from health workers in the Reporting and IT (Information Technology) section, previous research, books,
journals, theses, and the internet. The data obtained from the interview results were processed manually by
grouping the interview results according to the research objectives. This study uses content analysis.
Page 517