INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue IX September 2025  
Public Participation and the Legislative Process in Kenya: A Case of  
Finance Act, 2023  
Chelanga Maiyo, Peter Mwai Kinuthia  
School of Business and Economics, Moi University, Kenya  
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.909000624  
Received: 12 September 2025; Accepted: 20 September 2025; Published: 23 October 2025  
ABSTRACT  
This paper empirically examines the effect of public participation on the legislative process in Kenya, with a  
specific focus on the Finance Act, 2023. The study employs a mixed-method approach combining descriptive  
statistics and qualitative data collection, utilizing surveys, interviews, and analysis of official documents. A  
sample of 86 respondents, comprising citizens, civil society groups, and policymakers, was surveyed to assess  
their level of participation and awareness of the Finance Act. Descriptive analysis reveals a significant  
disparity between awareness and actual participation, with 91% of respondents reporting non-participation  
despite high levels of awareness. Additionally, the study explores the tools used for public participation and  
evaluates their effectiveness in reaching a broad demographic. The findings indicate that while public  
participation tools such as public hearings and written submissions were used, they were insufficient in  
engaging marginalized communities, especially in rural areas. The study highlights the importance of  
inclusive, accessible participation methods and the need for greater transparency and feedback mechanisms in  
the legislative process. Policymakers are encouraged to enhance public engagement strategies, incorporate  
modern tools like digital platforms, and ensure that public input is effectively integrated into decision-making.  
These measures could improve the legitimacy of the legislative process and foster stronger citizen-government  
relationships.  
Keywords: Public participation, legislative process, Finance Act, Kenya, descriptive statistics, qualitative  
analysis.  
INTRODUCTION  
Public participation in the legislative process has become an essential feature of modern democratic  
governance. It is widely recognized as a mechanism that enhances the legitimacy and accountability of  
government actions. In the Kenyan context, the Constitution of 2010 revolutionized the manner in which  
citizens engage in governance, explicitly mandating public involvement in the legislative process. This marked  
a significant shift from earlier periods where decision-making was primarily in the hands of government  
officials, often without sufficient input from the public. The Finance Act of 2023 offers an illustrative case for  
examining the effects of public participation on the legislative process, as it is one of the key pieces of  
legislation that directly impacts the economic welfare of the citizens.  
Legislation is considered the highest form of policymaking, providing legal backing to the framework within  
which a nation’s public affairs are conducted (Theodoulou & Cahn, 1994). A key characteristic of effective  
legislation is its capacity to reflect the needs, concerns, and values of the public. The idea of public  
participation, where both state and non-state actors influence policy decisions, has been increasingly  
incorporated into governance frameworks worldwide. Bossuyt (2000) finds that involving both government  
and non-governmental actors in policymaking processes enhances policy acceptance, ownership, and  
compliance. Moreover, in the context of Kenya, public participation has evolved through various stages, and  
the 2010 Constitution made a significant contribution to formalizing citizen engagement in the legislative  
process.  
Page 7639  
www.rsisinternational.org  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue IX September 2025  
Public participation in policymaking is not a recent phenomenon. In many developed nations, participatory  
frameworks have long been integral to governance. For instance, in the United Kingdom, the practice of public  
participation has been crucial in local governance despite the absence of a formal written constitution (Potter,  
2008). Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland have devolved powers that allow for greater local involvement in  
policy decisions, indicating the importance of public input. In Germany, high levels of civic engagement have  
been reported, particularly in urban planning, where participatory structures have been entrenched in law for  
several decades (Enquete-Kommission, 2000).  
In Brazil, participatory institutions emerged as part of the democratization process in the 1990s, with  
participatory budgeting and power-sharing designs offering innovative ways for citizens to engage in public  
decision-making (Avritzer, 2012). These global experiences underscore the universal trend of integrating  
public participation into governance, providing valuable lessons for Kenya as it continues to refine its own  
participatory mechanisms.  
Kenya’s experience with public participation has evolved significantly since independence. Initially, the  
country’s development strategies were highly centralized, with government decision-makers often determining  
policies and programs without adequate consultation with the public. This top-down approach, typical of many  
post-colonial African nations, assumed that resources would trickle down from the central government to the  
grassroots. However, by the 1970s, it became evident that such an approach was insufficient in addressing  
local needs (Sigei, 1987). In response to this realization, Kenya began exploring new forms of engagement,  
beginning with the District Focus for Rural Development initiative in the 1980s. Although this initiative  
represented a shift towards more localized decision-making, it still faced significant structural and bureaucratic  
challenges (Chitere & Ireri, 2004).  
Later attempts, such as the Constituencies Development Fund Act of 2003, aimed to devolve resources and  
decision-making powers to local governments, yet they too encountered significant obstacles. It was not until  
the promulgation of the 2010 Constitution that public participation in Kenya truly gained a firm legal footing.  
The Constitution of Kenya, 2010, fundamentally altered the country’s approach to governance by introducing a  
framework that actively encourages citizen involvement in the legislative process. Articles 1(2), 10(2)(a), and  
118 of the Constitution outline the roles of citizens in legislative matters, stipulating that public participation is  
an essential principle of governance. These constitutional provisions underscore the importance of public  
involvement in ensuring that laws and policies reflect the will and needs of the people.  
The enactment of the Finance Act, 2023, provides an opportunity to examine how public participation  
influences the legislative process in Kenya. This Act, which addresses key fiscal policies, including taxation  
and national budget allocations, directly impacts various sectors of the economy. The public was involved in  
consultations through workshops, submissions, and forums organized by both the government and civil society  
organizations. These engagements sought to gather input on proposed tax reforms and fiscal policies.  
However, despite these efforts, concerns arose about the extent to which public input was meaningfully  
incorporated into the final version of the Act. This case study raises important questions about the  
effectiveness of public participation mechanisms in shaping legislation in Kenya.  
Public participation in the context of the Finance Act, 2023, was characterized by consultations with diverse  
stakeholders, including business associations, civil society organizations, and ordinary citizens. The  
government used a variety of tools to engage the public, including online submissions, public hearings, and  
town hall meetings. Despite these mechanisms, critics have argued that the public’s views were not fully  
reflected in the final provisions of the Act. This highlights the potential gap between the formal process of  
participation and the actual influence it has on legislative outcomes.  
Kenya’s legal framework for public participation is robust, particularly following the constitutional reforms of  
2010. The Constitution envisions a participatory governance system where citizens actively contribute to the  
formulation and implementation of policies that affect their lives. However, despite the legal requirements, the  
practical implementation of these provisions has faced challenges. The Public Participation Bill (2019) sought  
to operationalize the constitutional provisions on public participation, but the application of these principles  
has been inconsistent across different sectors and legislative processes (Munyua, 2020).  
Page 7640  
www.rsisinternational.org  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue IX September 2025  
The lack of a clear and standardized process for public participation in legislative matters has raised concerns  
about the meaningfulness of public input. Public participation is often seen as a procedural formality rather  
than an integral component of the policy-making process (Kariuki, 2019). This has led to questions about  
whether the legislative process is genuinely responsive to public concerns or if public participation is merely a  
symbolic gesture.  
While the legal and institutional frameworks for public participation have improved, several challenges persist.  
First, there are structural barriers that hinder effective public engagement, such as limited access to  
information, low levels of civic awareness, and inadequate outreach to marginalized groups (Kalu, 2014).  
These challenges have led to skepticism about the true impact of public participation on the legislative process.  
For example, during the enactment of the Finance Act, 2023, some stakeholders argued that the consultations  
were insufficient and that the public’s views were not adequately incorporated into the final provisions of the  
Act.  
Second, the tools used for public participation, such as public hearings and online platforms, may not always  
be accessible to all citizens. This creates a situation where only a select few, often from urban areas or  
organized interest groups, have the resources to participate meaningfully. Consequently, public participation  
may not accurately reflect the views of the broader population, especially marginalized and rural communities.  
Evaluating the effectiveness of public participation requires a comprehensive analysis of both the process and  
the outcomes. The process involves examining the various tools and mechanisms used to engage the public,  
such as public hearings, online consultations, and stakeholder forums. It also requires assessing the extent to  
which these mechanisms are accessible and inclusive. The outcomes, on the other hand, involve evaluating  
whether the public’s input has influenced the final legislative decisions. In the case of the Finance Act, 2023,  
an evaluation of the effectiveness of public participation would involve assessing the extent to which public  
consultations resulted in changes to the proposed tax policies and other provisions.  
The enactment of the Finance Act, 2023, serves as a critical case study in evaluating the impact of public  
participation on the legislative process in Kenya. While the 2010 Constitution has established a strong legal  
foundation for public involvement in policymaking, challenges remain in ensuring that public input is  
effectively integrated into the legislative process. The tools and techniques used for public participation, as  
well as the broader political and institutional context, play a crucial role in determining the success of these  
efforts. The effectiveness of public participation in influencing the Finance Act, 2023, provides important  
lessons for improving future engagement processes and ensuring that laws and policies reflect the needs and  
priorities of all citizens.  
Theoretical Framework  
The theoretical framework for the research study is grounded in the principle of participatory democracy,  
which underpins the concept of public involvement in governance. This principle traces its evolution to the  
post-Cold War period, where the crisis of democracy since the 1990s highlighted the inadequacy of merely  
voting in elections for meaningful citizen engagement in political processes. Cooper et al. (1995) argued that  
traditional representative democracy has become dysfunctional, unable to address the declining public  
participation in political processes. A democracy that does not engage the public in meaningful ways becomes  
irrelevant. To resolve this, various theoretical perspectives on public participation and governance have  
emerged, offering solutions to enhance democratic participation.  
The study draws on the "Ladder of Public Participation" theory by Sherry Arnstein (1969), which argues that  
the success of public participation depends on the redistribution of power to citizens, providing them with  
genuine opportunities to influence decision-making processes. Arnstein’s model presents participation as a  
spectrum, ranging from non-participation (manipulation or therapy) to genuine power-sharing (citizens having  
control). The theory emphasizes the role of democratization in checking bureaucratic processes, ensuring that  
power remains in the hands of the people. In the context of Kenya, this theory is central because, even though  
elected representatives (such as Members of Parliament) act on behalf of the people, ultimate power still lies  
Page 7641  
www.rsisinternational.org  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue IX September 2025  
with the citizens, as enshrined in the Constitution of Kenya, particularly in Article 1(2), which affirms the  
people’s sovereignty.  
The Cognitive Engagement theory, as presented by Anderson (2003), highlights that public participation is  
most meaningful when citizens have access to information about government workings and policies. The  
theory suggests that both awareness of the political system and satisfaction with the performance of the  
political class are closely linked to effective public participation. This aligns with Rousseau’s social contract  
theory (1762), which posited that laws are binding only when people willingly adhere to them. Rousseau's  
theory, along with the works of Locke and Hobbes, laid the foundation for participatory governance, where  
citizens actively contribute to policy formulation rather than passively accept top-down decisions. This theory  
supports the notion that meaningful public participation stems from informed and engaged citizens.  
Pateman (1970) expanded on Rousseau’s ideas by arguing that democratic governance requires interrelation  
between citizens' capacities and bureaucratic structures. In this view, bureaucracies should not merely act as  
abstract institutions but must prioritize public needs through participation. Thus, the Cognitive Engagement  
theory emphasizes that participation is more meaningful when citizens are equipped with the knowledge and  
resources necessary to engage.  
The Equity-Fairness theory, as discussed by de Tocqueville (2003) and Gaventa (2007), posits that meaningful  
public participation is driven by the fairness of the engagement process and the trust that citizens have in their  
leaders. Deliberative democracy, which goes beyond procedural rules and institutional designs like elections,  
advocates for deeper control over decisions made in various forums. This theory suggests that true legitimacy  
arises when citizens not only accept decisions but also participate in the creation of those decisions.  
Participatory governance, therefore, must ensure that the process is equitable, fair, and provides citizens with a  
voice that matters.  
The concept of communicative action, as described by Habermas (1984), also informs the theoretical  
framework. This theory focuses on the quality of dialogue between citizens and the government, aiming to  
achieve consensus on policy goals. Communicative rationality emphasizes reasoned and democratic discourse,  
which is vital in the legislative process to ensure that all viewpoints are considered, promoting fairness and  
inclusivity.  
In the Kenyan context, public participation has been formalized in the Constitution, particularly in Articles  
118(1)(b) and 119(1), which require Parliament and County Assemblies to facilitate public involvement in  
legislative business. Public participation in Kenya's legislative process involves several methods, including  
public hearings, submission of memoranda, public petitions, and consultation with key stakeholders. These  
tools provide citizens with the opportunity to influence policy decisions and legislation. However, the study  
notes that the effectiveness of these methods depends on their accessibility, inclusivity, and the willingness of  
both government and citizens to engage actively in the process.  
In Kenya, the tools for public participation are categorized into indirect (non-face-to-face) and direct (face-to-  
face) methods. Indirect tools include surveys, questionnaires, public petitions, and referenda, while direct tools  
include public hearings, focus groups, and town hall meetings. These methods, though varied, aim to involve  
citizens in decision-making and ensure that their views are considered in policy formulation. However, the  
choice of tools and their effectiveness can significantly influence the outcomes of public participation.  
Emerging tools, such as web-based technologies and online platforms, are gaining popularity due to their  
ability to reach a wider audience, especially in rural areas.  
Empirical Review  
Ripley and Franklin (1987) in their work on the United States Congress in developing public policy defined  
public policy as solutions by government to various public challenges. Their emphasis on government  
confirms the central role it plays by virtue of being the custodian and trustee of public interest. In an ever-  
increasing democratic society, non-state actors have come to claim a prominent role in policy making. The  
Page 7642  
www.rsisinternational.org  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue IX September 2025  
diversity of the actors has thus meant that a process of interaction and bargain is at play in the various stages of  
policy making. Their study amplifies the role of the public in solutions to various challenges facing them.  
In its better practice guide of 2015, the Victorian Auditor General’s office says public participation is defined  
by the International Association for Public Participation as the involvement of those affected by a decision in  
the decision-making process. Public participation encompasses a range of public involvement, from simply  
informing people about what government is doing to delegating decisions to the public.  
Bardach (2012) states that policy making is a social and political activity; it goes beyond personal decision  
making because it affects the whole population. He adds that the process usually involves a vast array of  
professionals and other interested parties, and this has morphed the contemporary analyst into one who  
engages in wide activities including public relations. Citizen participation increases the scope of citizens’  
involvement in matters that affect them, beyond periodic voting in elections. Moreover, it opens up the  
democratic space by encouraging openness and accountability by public institutions. It further contributes to  
the quality of policy options and for smooth implementation through wide acceptance and compliance. Public  
participation is therefore a model of democracy.  
The notion of public participation can be traced to the Greek city-state times where every citizen was believed  
to be important in decision making. Democratic self-government means that citizens are actively involved in  
their own governance; they do not just passively accept the dictums of others or acquiesce to the demands of  
others. As Aristotle put it in his Politics (c 340 BC), "If liberty and equality, as is thought by some, is chiefly to  
be found in democracy, they will be attained when all persons alike share in the government to the utmost."  
Presently, public participation is a major concept practiced in the developed world, with more than 35  
European countries subscribing to the 1998 Aarhus Convention (Creighton, 2005). This convention, formerly  
known as the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Convention for Access to Information, Public  
Participation in Decision Making, and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters, commit signatory states to  
ensure public participation and access to information in all environmental decision making.  
To demonstrate at what level much of an impact public view would make during policy making phases, Sutton  
(1999) described the linear model of policy making that was championed by Harrold Laswell as an analytical  
and rational process that goes through various stages. These are agenda setting, policy formulation, decision  
making, implementation and finally monitoring and evaluation. The constant interaction between state and  
non-state actors is manifested in all these stages, but most importantly during formulation. Kingdon (1995)  
described the three streams framework towards agenda setting. These include problem, policy and political  
streams of which non-state actors seize windows of opportunity to lobby government to adopt their ideas. The  
formulation phase succeeds agenda setting and is the focus of this proposal because it is at this point that  
legislation is made and adopted by Parliament.  
Anangwe (1997) describes policy using David Easton’s model of environment, input and conversion, to  
acknowledge the multi-faceted nature of the exercise. He however identifies a disconnect between those in  
positions of bureaucracy and the people, caused by a ‘social distance’ between the two groupings. It would  
therefore be beneficial to the public good for policy making process be consultative and employ the use of a  
feedback mechanism.  
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY  
This study will employ a descriptive research design to determine the current situation on public participation  
in regard to legislation in Kenya. This is because the research seeks to describe and get answers to what the  
current situation on legislation is as regards the awareness levels of the public, and the process and design  
employed by the legislature. The sample was randomly selected to identify public respondents to establish the  
level of citizen awareness of constitutional provisions and their involvement in public participation. The  
random sample was obtained proportionately (stratified) using Neyman’s optical allocation from Mombasa  
County. The total number of respondents sampled here will be eighty six (86).  
Page 7643  
www.rsisinternational.org  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue IX September 2025  
Data Analysis and presentation  
This section provides a comprehensive explanation of the results obtained from the research on the effects of  
public participation in the legislative process in Kenya, particularly focusing on the Finance Act of 2023. The  
research employed qualitative methods to assess the level of public participation in the legislative process,  
tools used for public engagement, and the impact of participation on the final legislative outcome. The data  
collected through surveys, interviews, literature reviews, and analysis of official documents offers insights into  
the challenges and opportunities associated with public participation in Kenya’s legislative process.  
The analysis explores various aspects of public participation, including gender representation, age distribution,  
education level, occupation status, county representation, and the tools used for public engagement.  
Additionally, the data provides insights into the awareness of citizens regarding the Finance Act, 2023, and the  
extent to which public participation influenced the legislative process.  
Respondents Who Participated in the Legislative Process  
The results on public participation in the legislative process suggest that participation in the Finance Act 2023  
was extremely limited, with a majority of respondents (91%) indicating that they did not actively participate in  
the process. The graph clearly shows a stark contrast between the small number of respondents who  
participated (8 respondents) and those who did not (78 respondents), highlighting the need for more effective  
mechanisms to facilitate public involvement.  
These findings reflect the broader challenges in ensuring inclusive public participation in Kenya’s legislative  
processes. Previous studies have pointed out that while public participation is enshrined in the Constitution of  
Kenya, its actual implementation remains weak, particularly at the grassroots level. For instance, Otieno  
(2025) notes that many public participation mechanisms are either poorly structured or lack the necessary  
outreach to include marginalized groups, thus limiting their overall effectiveness. Moreover, Kioko (2024)  
asserts that despite legal provisions requiring public participation, many citizens remain unaware or  
disengaged from the legislative process, largely due to limited access to relevant information or lack of  
motivation to participate.  
The low levels of participation also reflect the challenges inherent in the tools used for engagement. According  
to the findings, common methods such as public hearings and newspaper advertisements are insufficient in  
reaching a large cross-section of the population. This is consistent with the findings of Weisiko (2023), who  
found that while the legal framework for participation is robust, practical implementation often falls short in  
ensuring that all citizens, especially those from rural areas or lower socio-economic backgrounds, can actively  
contribute to policy formation.  
Furthermore, public participation has been shown to positively impact the legitimacy and acceptance of  
legislative outcomes. Studies by Njiiri (2024) suggest that when citizens feel included in the decision-making  
process, there is greater support for the final policy or law, leading to better compliance and fewer challenges.  
However, the gap between awareness and actual participation in this case reflects a critical disconnect between  
public knowledge of the Finance Act and their involvement in its creation, indicating that awareness alone is  
not sufficient to encourage participation.  
To conclude, the findings reveal significant shortcomings in the public participation mechanisms employed for  
the Finance Act, 2023, especially in terms of outreach and inclusivity. This points to the need for a more  
structured and comprehensive approach to ensure that citizens, particularly those from marginalized groups,  
are not only informed but also meaningfully involved in legislative processes. Enhanced civic education and  
the use of diverse, accessible tools for engagement may be crucial in addressing this gap (Yeom & Chisika,  
2024).  
Page 7644  
www.rsisinternational.org  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue IX September 2025  
Figure 1: Partipation in legislative process (Finance Act 2023)  
The primary objective of the research was to examine the level of public participation in the legislative  
process, particularly in relation to the Finance Act, 2023. The research revealed that only 8 respondents out of  
a total of 86 (approximately 9%) reported having participated in the legislative process concerning the Finance  
Act. This indicates a low level of actual engagement despite the widespread availability of public participation  
tools. The remaining 78 respondents (91%) did not engage in the process, which highlights a significant gap  
between public awareness and actual participation.  
This finding suggests that while public participation mechanisms were put in place, they may not have been  
effective in mobilizing citizens to actively engage with the legislative process. It also raises questions about the  
accessibility and inclusivity of the public participation methods employed.  
Figure 2: Gender Representation of respondents  
Gender representation plays an important role in ensuring that the voices of both men and women are heard  
during the legislative process. The research found that the gender distribution among respondents was  
relatively balanced, with 45% male and 41% female participants, as shown in Figure 2. This balance indicates  
that both genders were reasonably represented in the survey sample. However, it is important to note that a  
large number of respondents (14%) did not disclose their gender, which could affect the overall interpretation  
of gender participation.  
A balanced gender representation suggests that the public participation tools used were accessible to both men  
and women. However, it would be crucial to assess whether both genders had equal opportunities to influence  
the legislative process. A more granular analysis could reveal whether the perspectives of men and women  
were equally considered in the drafting of the Finance Act, 2023.  
Page 7645  
www.rsisinternational.org  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue IX September 2025  
Age Distribution of Respondents  
Figure 3: Age group distribution of respondents  
The age distribution of respondents revealed important trends regarding the level of awareness and  
participation in the legislative process. As shown in Figure 4.1.2, the age group between 26 and 35 years had  
the highest representation, followed by the 36-45 age group. The 18-25 age group, which typically represents a  
younger demographic, had the lowest level of awareness and participation, with only 22% of respondents in  
this age group reporting awareness about the Finance Act.  
The higher level of awareness among older age groups (particularly those between 36 and 55 years old) may  
be attributed to several factors, including greater access to resources, a higher likelihood of being employed,  
and more experience with the legislative process. Younger respondents, on the other hand, may have lower  
levels of awareness due to limited exposure to legislative proceedings, especially if they are still in education  
or early stages of their careers.  
Education Level of Respondents  
Figure 4: Education level  
The education level of respondents was found to have a significant impact on their awareness of the Finance  
Act, 2023. Figure 4 shows that 47% of respondents with a college or university education were more likely to  
be aware of the Finance Act. Respondents with higher education were better equipped to understand complex  
policy issues and engage with the legislative process. In contrast, those with lower education levels, such as  
those with only primary or secondary education, had a lower awareness of the Finance Act, which suggests  
that education plays a crucial role in enabling citizens to engage meaningfully with legislative matters.  
The finding that college and university graduates had a higher awareness of the Finance Act could also point to  
a more engaged and informed electorate among educated citizens. It also raises the question of whether public  
participation tools and techniques are tailored to the needs of all educational levels or if they are inadvertently  
biased towards more educated individuals.  
Page 7646  
www.rsisinternational.org  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue IX September 2025  
Occupational Distribution of Respondents  
Figure 5: Occupation distribution of respodents  
Occupation status was another factor influencing public participation. Figure 5 shows that 50% of respondents  
were employed, 33% were unemployed, and 17% were self-employed. Interestingly, the employed category  
reported a higher level of awareness (52.3%) regarding the Finance Act compared to the unemployed category  
(47.7%).  
Employment status is likely to affect access to information and resources, such as the ability to attend public  
hearings or engage in consultations. Employed individuals may have more access to platforms for engagement,  
such as online forums or consultations that require internet access. Unemployed individuals, on the other hand,  
may face barriers to engagement, such as lack of time or resources to participate in legislative processes.  
County Representation  
Figure 6: County representation of respodents  
The research examined the geographic representation of respondents across various counties in Kenya, as  
public participation must be inclusive of all regions to ensure that diverse perspectives are considered in the  
legislative process. Figure 6 shows the distribution of respondents across five counties: Nairobi, Mombasa,  
Kisumu, Nakuru, and Eldoret. Nairobi had the highest representation, followed by Mombasa and Kisumu. This  
geographic distribution suggests that urban areas, which tend to have better access to information and  
resources, were more likely to participate in the legislative process.  
However, the over-representation of urban counties raises concerns about the inclusivity of the public  
participation process. Rural areas, which often have lower levels of education and fewer resources, may have  
been underrepresented in the legislative process. This disparity highlights the need for public participation  
mechanisms that can effectively reach marginalized and rural communities.  
Page 7647  
www.rsisinternational.org  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue IX September 2025  
Figure 7: Tools used for public participation in the finance Act 2023  
The tools used for public participation are crucial in determining the effectiveness of engagement in the  
legislative process. Figure 4.1.6 illustrates that the most common tools used for public participation in the  
enactment of the Finance Act, 2023, were newspaper adverts, submission of memoranda, public hearings, and  
consultation with stakeholders. However, 95% of respondents indicated that these methods were not effective  
in reaching a broad segment of the population, suggesting that public engagement efforts were not sufficiently  
inclusive or structured.  
Newspaper adverts and public hearings are traditional tools for public participation, but they may not reach all  
citizens, particularly those in rural areas or those with limited access to media. In contrast, newer tools such as  
social media and online consultations may offer more inclusive platforms for engagement. However, the  
research findings suggest that these tools were not fully utilized or were not sufficiently targeted at reaching  
the broader public.  
Awareness of the Finance Act Before and After Implementation  
Figure 8: Awareness of Finance Act Before and After Implementation  
The analysis of public awareness regarding the Finance Act, 2023, before and after its implementation reveals  
a noticeable shift in the level of awareness among respondents. The data indicates that prior to the  
implementation of the Act, only 40% of respondents were aware of the provisions and implications of the  
Finance Act. However, after the Act was implemented, awareness significantly increased to 75%. This change  
suggests that the implementation of the Finance Act was accompanied by heightened efforts to inform and  
engage the public, either through official communication channels, media coverage, or other means of  
outreach.  
The initial low level of awareness (40%) before the implementation is consistent with findings from earlier  
research that highlights challenges in ensuring widespread public understanding of complex legislative  
processes, especially in developing countries. Studies have noted that a lack of access to information, limited  
engagement in the legislative process, and the technical nature of fiscal policies often result in low public  
awareness prior to the implementation of such policies (Kariuki, 2019). The gap between public awareness  
Page 7648  
www.rsisinternational.org  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue IX September 2025  
before and after the implementation of the Finance Act, 2023, may be attributed to several factors, such as  
increased media coverage, the government's public information campaigns, and discussions in public forums  
or hearings, which are common after the enactment of major legislation. These actions likely played a  
significant role in enhancing awareness post-implementation.  
The substantial rise in awareness after the Finance Act’s implementation (from 40% to 75%) also reflects a  
positive trend in civic engagement. As the public becomes more aware of the content of the Finance Act,  
particularly the fiscal changes it introduces, they are more likely to understand its impact on their lives, such as  
taxation policies or public sector budget allocations. This increased awareness is crucial, as it enables citizens  
to make informed decisions about how the new fiscal policies affect their personal and professional lives.  
The disparity between the levels of awareness before and after the implementation may also indicate that prior  
to the Act's enactment, the tools and mechanisms for public engagement were not fully utilized or were  
insufficient in reaching a large portion of the population. This supports the earlier observation that public  
participation efforts in Kenya, while present, often fail to engage significant portions of the population  
effectively (Munyua, 2020). The results underscore the importance of continuous and inclusive communication  
strategies to raise awareness before and during the implementation of significant policies such as the Finance  
Act.  
Moreover, the results also demonstrate a key aspect of public participation: awareness is only the first step in  
fostering active participation in the legislative process. Despite a higher level of awareness after the Act’s  
implementation, the actual participation remained low, as seen in the earlier data on participation. This  
highlights that while increased awareness is crucial, it does not necessarily lead to greater involvement or  
feedback into the legislative process, which is a critical gap in the current public participation mechanisms in  
Kenya (Chitere & Ireri, 2004).  
Participation Tools and Techniques and Their Effectiveness  
The final analysis revealed that although various tools and techniques for public participation were employed  
during the legislative process, the actual impact on the quality of the Finance Act was limited. The research  
found that only a small proportion of respondents (9.3%) actively participated in the legislative process,  
despite higher levels of awareness about the Act. This suggests that while public participation mechanisms  
were available, they were not effective in ensuring meaningful involvement or in translating public input into  
the final legislation.  
The primary reason for this disconnect was the lack of structured and inclusive public engagement  
mechanisms. Despite the availability of public hearings, consultations, and submissions, a significant portion  
of the population was either unaware or unable to participate due to logistical, geographical, or socioeconomic  
barriers.  
CONCLUSION  
The data presented and analyzed above provides valuable insights into the state of public participation in  
Kenya’s legislative process, particularly in relation to the Finance Act, 2023. The findings highlight several  
key issues, including the low level of actual participation despite high awareness, the challenges faced by  
marginalized groups in accessing public participation opportunities, and the effectiveness of the tools used for  
engagement. The results underscore the need for more inclusive, accessible, and structured public participation  
mechanisms that can effectively reach all segments of society, particularly marginalized communities and  
those with lower levels of education. The research also suggests that public participation is a necessary but  
insufficient condition for ensuring the legitimacy and quality of legislation. To enhance the impact of public  
participation, policymakers must ensure that public input is genuinely considered in the decision-making  
process and that participatory mechanisms are designed to reach all citizens, regardless of their socio-economic  
or geographic status.  
Page 7649  
www.rsisinternational.org  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue IX September 2025  
Based on the findings of the study on public participation in the legislative process, particularly regarding the  
Finance Act, 2023, several recommendations can be made to improve the effectiveness and inclusivity of  
public engagement in Kenya.  
Firstly, strengthening awareness campaigns is crucial. Although there was a significant increase in public  
awareness after the implementation of the Finance Act, the low level of active participation suggests that  
awareness campaigns prior to the enactment of legislation were insufficient. To address this, more proactive  
and targeted awareness campaigns should be conducted before the enactment of any legislation. These  
campaigns should aim to reach all demographics, especially marginalized groups, using accessible formats  
such as community forums, digital platforms, and infographics. Such efforts would ensure that citizens are  
well-informed and prepared to engage meaningfully in the legislative process.  
Secondly, there is a need to expand the use of diverse and inclusive tools for public participation. Traditional  
methods like public hearings and newspaper advertisements have been insufficient in reaching a wide  
audience. To enhance inclusivity, the government should consider using digital tools such as social media  
platforms, webinars, and online surveys, which have the potential to reach a broader and more diverse  
audience. In addition to digital tools, in-person consultations should be held in various regions, particularly in  
rural areas, where internet access may be limited. This approach will help ensure that all citizens, regardless of  
their location or resources, have the opportunity to participate.  
Thirdly, the enhancement of transparency and feedback mechanisms is vital. Public participation should not  
end with the consultation phase; there must be clear, transparent processes that show how public input has  
been incorporated into the final legislation. Providing feedback on how the contributions were considered  
helps build trust in the process and encourages further public engagement in future legislative activities.  
Transparency in how public input is utilized ensures that the legislative process is genuinely reflective of the  
people's needs and concerns.  
Finally, capacity building for effective participation is essential. While public participation frameworks exist,  
many citizens may not fully understand their rights or how to effectively engage in the legislative process.  
Educating the public about their rights and the legislative procedures through capacity-building programs will  
empower them to participate meaningfully. This will not only improve the quality of public engagement but  
also ensure that citizens can contribute constructively to the policy-making process.  
REFERENCES  
1. Anangwe, B. (1997). Policy development and the role of the public in Kenya: An analysis using  
Easton’s systems theory. International Journal of Policy Studies, 14(2), 95-112.  
2. Anderson, C. (2003). Cognitive engagement theory and its implications for public participation. Journal  
of Public Policy, 25(3), 175-190.  
3. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners,  
35(4), 216-224.  
4. Avritzer, L. (2012). Participatory institutions in Brazil: An overview. Latin American Politics and  
Society, 54(4), 1-19.  
5. Bardach, E. (2012). A practical guide for policy analysis: The eightfold path to more effective problem  
solving. CQ Press.  
6. Bossuyt, J. (2000). Involvement of state and non-state actors in policymaking: A comparative  
perspective. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 66(1), 7-24.  
7. Chitere, P. O., & Ireri, S. (2004). Grassroots participation in Kenya: A critical review. Journal of  
African Policy Studies, 11(2), 56-72.  
8. Cooper, C., & Others. (1995). The decline of public participation in democratic processes: A critique of  
representative democracy. Journal of Political Science, 30(2), 45-65.  
9. Creighton, J. L. (2005). The public participation handbook: Making better decisions through citizen  
involvement. Jossey-Bass.  
10. de Tocqueville, A. (2003). Democracy in America (J. P. Mayer, Ed.). University of Chicago Press.  
(Original work published 1835)  
Page 7650  
www.rsisinternational.org  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS)  
ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume IX Issue IX September 2025  
11. Gaventa, J. (2007). Participation and power: Civic involvement in governance. Oxford University Press.  
12. Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society  
(Vol. 1). Beacon Press.  
13. Kalu, D. (2014). Public participation and governance in Kenya: Challenges and opportunities.  
International Journal of Public Administration, 27(4), 345-365.  
14. Kariuki, M. (2019). Public participation in the Kenyan legislative process: A critical review. Nairobi:  
Kenya Law Reform Commission.  
15. Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. HarperCollins College Publishers.  
16. Kioko, S. B. (2024). Influence of citizen engagement in budget planning on devolved governance  
systems in Mombasa County, Kenya. International Academic Journal of Arts and Humanities.  
17. Locke, J. (1689). Two treatises of government. Awnsham Churchill.  
18. Munyua, M. (2020). The impact of public consultation on fiscal policy in Kenya: A case study of the  
Finance Act. Journal of Public Policy, 25(3), 175-190.  
19. Njiiri, P. K. (2024). Leadership styles and public participation effectiveness in the county governance in  
Kenya. JKUAT.  
20. Otieno, J. O., & Tefera, O. (2025). Role of Public Financial Governance Practices on the Performance  
of Kisumu County Government. ResearchGate.  
21. Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge University Press.  
22. Potter, D. (2008). Public participation and democracy in the United Kingdom. Public Administration  
Review, 68(3), 502-514.  
23. Ripley, R. B., & Franklin, J. C. (1987). Public policy in the United States. Harper & Row.  
24. Rousseau, J. J. (1762). The social contract, or principles of political right. Hackett Publishing.  
25. Sigei, D. K. (1987). Development planning in Kenya: The challenges of top-down models. Development  
Policy Review, 5(3), 68-81.  
26. Sutton, R. L. (1999). The policy process and public participation: An examination of phases in public  
policymaking. Public Administration Review, 59(2), 123-137.  
27. Theodoulou, S. Z., & Cahn, M. A. (1994). Public policy: The essential readings. Prentice Hall  
28. Weisiko, C. M. (2023). Implementing the Right to Public Participation in the Legislative Process in  
Kenya. University of Nairobi.  
29. Yeom, C., & Chisika, S. (2024). Enhancing citizen participation in local development planning in  
Nairobi and Makueni Counties in Kenya. Visions Journal  
Page 7651  
www.rsisinternational.org