RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
The current status of Higher Education Institution (HEI) libraries in the Province of Albay, underscoring their
role in maintaining academic excellence through stringent quality standards. Each institution operates its own
library, serving as a vital hub for education and research. Among these, three libraries are managed by private
institutions, while only one is under a public institution, potentially reflecting disparities in resource
availability and institutional support. These libraries undergo a rigorous accreditation process conducted by
esteemed bodies such as the Philippine Association of Colleges and Universities Commission on Accreditation
(PACUCOA), the Accrediting Agency of Chartered Colleges and Universities in the Philippines (AACCUP),
and the Philippine Accrediting Association of Schools, Colleges, and Universities (PAASCU). Accreditation
not only ensures compliance with established benchmarks but also demands a strong administrative
framework, effective governance, and continuous professional development of library personnel.
The factors influencing compliance in the accreditation of HEI libraries in Albay rated “Strongly Agree” in the
areas of Administration, Human Resources, Collection Management, Financial Resources, and Linkages and
Networking, indicating strong alignment with accreditation standards. In contrast, Services and Utilization/IT
Infrastructure and Physical Facilities received the lowest, though still “Agree”, ratings highlighting areas that
require further improvement to strengthen overall compliance. Weng’ua, Rotich and Kogos (2019) whose
study revealed that institutions struggle to provide efficient library information services with poor
administration, financial resources, IT Infrastructure, and physical facilities. Chepkorir, Naibei and
Cheruiyot (2019) emphasized on their study that having inadequate physical facilities with proper resources for
a library guarantees poor library information service which leads to failure in compliance with accreditation
requirements. This was also supported by Nyakweba, Muwangu, and Sendikadiwa (2020) whose study
revealed that because of physical facilities and resources inadequacies on their library, it leads to poor service
being provided to its user. Chaputula (2019) also indicated that IT Infrastructure is a necessity for a library to
be compliant with accreditation standards as it offers user information on different platforms providing
flexibility. The study also emphasized that if an institution’s library aims to provide efficient library
information services, an institution should invest in developing a good IT Infrastructure. In terms of Human
Resources, Udo-Anyanwu (2021) emphasized on her study that libraries should always prioritize human
resources when considering and planning the accreditation of their respective libraries as these individuals will
be a huge factor in providing necessary help and action for a successful accreditation. These claims were also
supported by Akanwa and Udo-Anyanwu (2021) whose study revealed that professional staff or human
resources in a library have different ways on developing organization and preparedness for a library especially
when it comes to preparing for important transitioning such as accreditation process. Obiano (2021) also
indicated that when it comes to accrediting libraries, collection management is one of the factors that are being
observed and assessed by accrediting bodies. In such way, many institutions who plan to be accredited are
ensuring that they are prepared and already developed proper collection management on their libraries.
Similarly, Chukwudi et.al., (2020) also supported the implications of the study emphasizing that linkages &
networks of a certain institution could be a crucial factor when it comes to accreditation of libraries.
For the level of compliance, the Administration aspect of accreditation was rated “Highly Complied”,
indicating strong adherence to standards, while the remaining six indicators Human Resources, Collection
Management, Services & Utilization/IT Infrastructure, Physical Facilities, Financial Resources, and Linkages
& Networking were categorized as “Complied”, suggesting areas needing further improvement. Notably,
Services & Utilization/IT Infrastructure was close to “Moderately Complied”, highlighting the need for
significant enhancements. Ayyanar et al. (2019) supported these findings, stating that accreditation compliance
is observed across multiple factors. Listor (2024) emphasized that HEI administrators in the Bicol Region
prioritize career advancement and provide strong support for library Human Resources through competitive
compensation and work environments. However, Lasig et al. (2024) found that only 18.75% of libraries in the
Philippines complied with CHED’s Collection Management standards, indicating insufficient efforts in
meeting requirements. Kwegyiriba et al. (2021) noted that IT infrastructure and physical facilities are key
indicators of accreditation compliance, with libraries improving services post-accreditation. Alcober (2022)
highlighted that accredited libraries provide better IT tools, internet access, and e-resources, leading to
Page 512