Compliance on Library Standards in Accreditation of Higher  
Education Institutions (HEIs) in the Province of Albay: An  
Assessment  
Rapunzel M. Marigondon  
Bicol College Daraga, Albay, Philippines  
Received: 29 March 2025; Accepted: 04 April 2025; Published: 06 May 2025  
ABSTRACT  
The compliance of library standards in accreditation is essential in ensuring quality education and institutional  
excellence. Accreditation serves as a mechanism for maintaining high academic standards, with libraries  
playing a crucial role in fostering learning, research, and knowledge dissemination. As accreditation  
requirements evolve, libraries must adapt to digital transformation, enhance resource accessibility, and improve  
user engagement. However, libraries worldwide face challenges in meeting these standards, particularly in IT  
infrastructure, collection management, and staffing. The Commission on Higher Education (CHED) mandates  
that Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) establish libraries that adhere to specific standards to support  
academic programs. To achieve the research objectives, a multi-method approach combining quantitative and  
qualitative techniques was utilized. The respondents of the study included licensed librarians assigned to  
academic libraries and selected faculty members from HEIs in Albay. To enhance compliance, preparedness,  
and accreditation readiness of HEI libraries in Albay, a proposed Library Compliance Framework was  
developed. This framework follows the Plan, Do, Check, and Act (PDCA) cycle, serving as a structured guide  
for ensuring that library operations align with accreditation standards and institutional goals. Beneficiaries of  
this study include accreditation bodies, non-accredited institutions, HEI administrators, librarians, faculty,  
students, and policymakers, who can utilize its findings to improve library compliance and accreditation  
preparedness.  
Keywords: Library standards, library compliance, accreditation, academic libraries, library assessment, Higher  
Education Institutions (HEIs) in Albay.  
INTRODUCTION  
The compliance of library standards in accreditation plays a crucial role in ensuring quality education and  
institutional excellence. Across the globe, accreditation serves as a key mechanism for maintaining high  
academic standards, with libraries functioning as essential components in fostering learning, research, and  
knowledge dissemination. However, despite the universal recognition of their importance, many institutions  
aim to meet accreditation standards but struggle due to high operational costs and fluctuating exchange rates  
for imported materials (Nkiko, 2021).  
Building upon these global challenges, many libraries in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) worldwide face  
substantial difficulties in sustaining compliance with accreditation requirements. Factors such as limited  
financial resources, staffing shortages, and technological constraints continue to pose significant hurdles (Hitt,  
2024).  
In the Philippine context, these challenges are further shaped by legal mandates. The compliance with the  
Philippine Librarianship Act of 2003 (RA No. 9246) and the Higher Education Act of 1994 (RA No. 7722)  
reinforces the role of libraries in upholding academic integrity and institutional accreditation. Moreover,  
CHED CMO No. 22, Series of 2021, sets comprehensive standards for HEI libraries, particularly in  
administration, human resources, collection management, and IT infrastructure. Yet, despite these frameworks,  
many institutions struggle to integrate modern library systems, such as digital repositories and online  
databases, which are essential for meeting evolving accreditation requirements.  
Page 509  
Given these persistent challenges, there is a growing need for strategic planning, increased investment in  
library resources, and collaborative efforts among stakeholders to strengthen library compliance in the region.  
Ultimately, the findings of this study will provide valuable insights for policymakers, academic administrators,  
and librarians in formulating evidence-based policies and strategies. These efforts aim to enhance library  
compliance, preparedness, and readiness in accreditation in ensuring long-term sustainability and excellence in  
library accreditation compliance.  
FRAMEWORK  
The study explores a theoretical paradigm that incorporates Total Quality Management (TQM), Systems  
Theory, and Contingency Theory to provide a comprehensive framework for understanding and ensuring  
compliance with library standards in the accreditation process of Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in  
Albay. Total Quality Management (TQM), developed by W. Edwards Deming (1986), emphasizes continuous  
improvement, stakeholder satisfaction, and systematic processes in achieving excellence. Under TQM,  
libraries are encouraged to adopt a customer-centric approach, where the needs of students, faculty, and the  
academic community are central to decision-making and service delivery. Systems Theory, proposed by  
Ludwig von Bertalanffy (1968), highlights the interconnectedness of various components within an  
organization. It suggests that a library should be viewed as part of a larger educational system. This perspective  
fosters an understanding of how the library interacts with other departments and contributes to institutional  
goals. According to Systems Theory, a library functions as an interconnected unit in which each element  
influences the others inefficiencies or strengths in one area (such as human or financial resources) ripple  
through the system and affect other areas like collection management or IT infrastructure. For instance, a well-  
supported human resources department can ensure adequate staffing and training, which, in turn, enhances  
service delivery and optimizes the use of IT infrastructure. Contingency Theory, developed by Fred Fiedler  
(1970), asserts that the effectiveness of organizational strategies, including those related to library compliance,  
depends on a variety of internal and external factors. This theory posits that there is no universal approach to  
meeting compliance standards set by accrediting bodies. Instead, libraries must consider their unique contexts  
such as institutional size, available resources, user demographics, and the specific requirements of their  
accrediting agencies. For example, a large university library with extensive funding and staffing may adopt a  
more formalized and structured approach to compliance, while a smaller community college library with  
limited resources may need to implement a more flexible strategy to achieve similar goals. By applying  
Contingency Theory, library administrators can identify the factors that influence their operations and tailor  
their strategies accordingly. This adaptability enables libraries to effectively align their services, collections,  
and administrative practices with evolving accreditation standards, thereby enhancing overall performance and  
user satisfaction. The researchers’ integrated theory provides a structured yet adaptable framework for ensuring  
that academic libraries meet regulatory and accreditation requirements while maintaining service excellence.  
From TQM, it inherits a focus on continuous improvement and quality assurance; from Systems Theory, it  
recognizes the interdependent nature of library functions; and from Contingency Theory, it emphasizes that  
compliance strategies must be flexible and responsive to context-specific variables. This integration empowers  
libraries to develop comprehensive compliance strategies that align with institutional goals, accreditation  
standards, and the evolving needs of their users. The Library Compliance Framework serves as a guiding  
structure for library governance, ensuring that academic libraries operate efficiently, remain accredited, and  
continue to provide high-quality services.  
Researcher’s Theory (Rapunzel M. Marigondon 2025)  
Figure 1. Theoretical Paradigm  
Page 510  
Objectives Of the Study  
The aim of this study is to assess compliance of the Library Standards in accreditation among the Higher  
Education Institution (HEIs) in the Province of Albay. In the end, the expected Framework will be developed  
based on the result of the study. Specifically, the following objectives will be answered: (1) Determine the  
current status of HEI libraries in Albay along: (a)Type of Institution; and (b) Accrediting Body, (2) Identify the  
factors influencing compliance in areas of: (a) Administration, (b) Human Resources, (c) Collection  
Management, (d) Services and Utilization / IT Infrastructure, (e) Physical Facilities, (f) Financial Resources,  
and (g) Linkages and Networking; (3) Evaluate the level of compliance with these factors on accreditation of  
HEI Libraries, and (4) Propose a Framework to enhance the compliance, preparedness and readiness for  
accreditation of HEIs libraries in the province of Albay.  
METHODOLOGY  
Research Design  
The study employed a multi method approach, combining quantitative and qualitative research techniques.  
Multi methods research is a research method that combines and integrates qualitative and quantitative research  
methods in a single research study. It involves collecting and analyzing qualitative and quantitative data to  
understand a phenomenon better and answer the research questions (Dawadi, Shrestha, & Giri, 2021).  
Research Site  
The study was conducted in the province of Albay, located in the Bicol Region (Region V) of the Philippines.  
Albay is known for its vibrant educational landscape to the region. It is home to several Higher Education  
Institutions (HEIs) that provide diverse academic programs, helping shape the province’s intellectual and  
professional landscape. The research focused on the municipality of Daraga and Legazpi City, the capital of  
Albay. Legazpi City is the province’s center of commerce, education, and government, hosting key institutions  
that drive regional development. Daraga, an adjacent first-class municipality, is also a significant educational  
hub, with institutions that cater to a wide range of academic disciplines. The study involved four HEIs  
operating within Daraga and Legazpi City, consisting of three private colleges and one public university. The  
respondents are librarians and selected faculty members of accredited HEIs in Albay.  
Instrumentation  
The researcher used a questionnaire which was adopted from the CHED Library Standards (CHED CMO No.  
22, Series of 2021) that are common to all programs that were executed by the librarian respondents, however  
some of the indicators were constructed by the researcher and was validated by other librarian in different  
Institution. The developed questionnaire is composed of four (4) different parts. While the remaining parts of  
the questionnaire are focused on interview-type questions, which were answered by the selected faculty  
members to assess the level of compliance with the factors on accreditation of Higher Education Institutions in  
the province of Albay, the researcher used a themed format for the interview. This approach allowed for a  
structured yet flexible discussion, enabling the identification of key themes and sub themes related to  
accreditation compliance, challenges, and best practices. The respondents were academic librarians and  
selected faculty members of accredited HEIs in Albay.  
Data Collection  
The researcher requested a list of Accredited higher education institutions (HEIs) in the province of Albay in a  
formal letter to the Regional Director of the Commission on Higher Education (CHED) via email. The  
researcher distributes a formal letter of asking permission sought for the School Administrators / Presidents  
and Librarians to conduct research to the identified HEIs in Albay for data gathering. The researcher distributes  
the communication letters and the survey instrument personally. The interview was conducted on a scheduled  
day on the availability of the librarians and faculty respondents. Pictures of the HEI libraries and the  
respondents was also captured during the interview and data gathering.  
Page 511  
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS  
The current status of Higher Education Institution (HEI) libraries in the Province of Albay, underscoring their  
role in maintaining academic excellence through stringent quality standards. Each institution operates its own  
library, serving as a vital hub for education and research. Among these, three libraries are managed by private  
institutions, while only one is under a public institution, potentially reflecting disparities in resource  
availability and institutional support. These libraries undergo a rigorous accreditation process conducted by  
esteemed bodies such as the Philippine Association of Colleges and Universities Commission on Accreditation  
(PACUCOA), the Accrediting Agency of Chartered Colleges and Universities in the Philippines (AACCUP),  
and the Philippine Accrediting Association of Schools, Colleges, and Universities (PAASCU). Accreditation  
not only ensures compliance with established benchmarks but also demands a strong administrative  
framework, effective governance, and continuous professional development of library personnel.  
The factors influencing compliance in the accreditation of HEI libraries in Albay rated “Strongly Agree” in the  
areas of Administration, Human Resources, Collection Management, Financial Resources, and Linkages and  
Networking, indicating strong alignment with accreditation standards. In contrast, Services and Utilization/IT  
Infrastructure and Physical Facilities received the lowest, though still “Agree”, ratings highlighting areas that  
require further improvement to strengthen overall compliance. Weng’ua, Rotich and Kogos (2019) whose  
study revealed that institutions struggle to provide efficient library information services with poor  
administration, financial resources, IT Infrastructure, and physical facilities. Chepkorir, Naibei and  
Cheruiyot (2019) emphasized on their study that having inadequate physical facilities with proper resources for  
a library guarantees poor library information service which leads to failure in compliance with accreditation  
requirements. This was also supported by Nyakweba, Muwangu, and Sendikadiwa (2020) whose study  
revealed that because of physical facilities and resources inadequacies on their library, it leads to poor service  
being provided to its user. Chaputula (2019) also indicated that IT Infrastructure is a necessity for a library to  
be compliant with accreditation standards as it offers user information on different platforms providing  
flexibility. The study also emphasized that if an institution’s library aims to provide efficient library  
information services, an institution should invest in developing a good IT Infrastructure. In terms of Human  
Resources, Udo-Anyanwu (2021) emphasized on her study that libraries should always prioritize human  
resources when considering and planning the accreditation of their respective libraries as these individuals will  
be a huge factor in providing necessary help and action for a successful accreditation. These claims were also  
supported by Akanwa and Udo-Anyanwu (2021) whose study revealed that professional staff or human  
resources in a library have different ways on developing organization and preparedness for a library especially  
when it comes to preparing for important transitioning such as accreditation process. Obiano (2021) also  
indicated that when it comes to accrediting libraries, collection management is one of the factors that are being  
observed and assessed by accrediting bodies. In such way, many institutions who plan to be accredited are  
ensuring that they are prepared and already developed proper collection management on their libraries.  
Similarly, Chukwudi et.al., (2020) also supported the implications of the study emphasizing that linkages &  
networks of a certain institution could be a crucial factor when it comes to accreditation of libraries.  
For the level of compliance, the Administration aspect of accreditation was rated “Highly Complied”,  
indicating strong adherence to standards, while the remaining six indicators Human Resources, Collection  
Management, Services & Utilization/IT Infrastructure, Physical Facilities, Financial Resources, and Linkages  
& Networking were categorized as “Complied”, suggesting areas needing further improvement. Notably,  
Services & Utilization/IT Infrastructure was close to “Moderately Complied”, highlighting the need for  
significant enhancements. Ayyanar et al. (2019) supported these findings, stating that accreditation compliance  
is observed across multiple factors. Listor (2024) emphasized that HEI administrators in the Bicol Region  
prioritize career advancement and provide strong support for library Human Resources through competitive  
compensation and work environments. However, Lasig et al. (2024) found that only 18.75% of libraries in the  
Philippines complied with CHED’s Collection Management standards, indicating insufficient efforts in  
meeting requirements. Kwegyiriba et al. (2021) noted that IT infrastructure and physical facilities are key  
indicators of accreditation compliance, with libraries improving services post-accreditation. Alcober (2022)  
highlighted that accredited libraries provide better IT tools, internet access, and e-resources, leading to  
Page 512  
increased user engagement. Lastly, Lim Li Min & Casselden (2021) stressed the importance of Financial  
Resources, revealing that proper budgeting  
and management significantly enhance library compliance and efficiency. Focus group discussions on Higher  
Education Institution (HEI) libraries in Albay highlighted key challenges in infrastructure, resource utilization,  
and accreditation readiness. Many HEIs faced poor ventilation, limited collaborative spaces, inadequate  
storage, and insufficient IT facilities, impacting usability. Faculty reliance on personal and online materials  
underscored the need for better resource promotion and curriculum-aligned collections. Accreditation  
compliance varied, with some HEIs excelling in planning and facility investment, while others required  
stronger faculty-librarian collaboration and resource management. To enhance accreditation and academic  
support, HEIs must expand digital access, improve physical facilities, and foster faculty-librarian partnerships,  
ensuring libraries effectively serve students and educators. This align with existing research on library facilities  
and academic support. Parbe, Phuti, and Barfi (2021) emphasized the impact of ventilation, lighting, and  
accessibility on user experience, while Gupiyem et al. (2021) highlighted the importance of adequate learning  
and collaborative spaces for effective research. Similarly, Donovan (2020) stressed that environmental  
conditions influence user engagement and resource preservation. Libraries play a critical role in curriculum  
development and teaching (Jensen & Howard, 2020), making updated, curriculum-aligned collections essential  
(Gonzalez & Ramirez, 2021). However, accessibility issues, such as remote library locations and limited  
research database access, hinder effective resource utilization (Gonzalez & Ramirez, 2021). Expanding digital  
collections is necessary to support faculty and students in modern learning environments (Vannier & Li, 2023).  
Enhanced faculty engagement through workshops and consultations strengthens accreditation compliance  
(Smith & Wright, 2022). The reliance on personal and online resources underscores the need for better  
promotion of library services (Woods & Turner, 2021). Additionally, timely material acquisition and efficient  
procurement processes are vital for maintaining relevant collections, as emphasized by Hill & Sutherland  
(2022) and Brown & James (2024). Strengthening these areas can help HEIs improve library effectiveness,  
accreditation readiness, and academic support.  
Ultimately, strengthening HEI libraries is not just a requirement for accreditation, it is a strategic imperative  
for academic excellence, institutional credibility, and the advancement of higher education in the region.  
Translational Research  
This study bridges theory and practice by translating research findings into actionable strategies that enhance  
library compliance, preparedness, and readiness for accreditation. By identifying gaps in accreditation  
compliance and proposing a structured Library Compliance Framework, this research provides practical  
solutions that Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in Albay can implement to improve their library operations.  
The findings can inform policymakers, academic administrators, and librarians in developing evidence-based  
policies, optimizing resource allocation, and adopting best practices to meet accreditation standards.  
Furthermore, the study emphasizes the role of digital transformation, IT infrastructure, and financial resource  
management in achieving accreditation compliance. Through this translational approach, the study not only  
contributes to academic literature but also serves as a practical guide for HEIs to enhance their library services.  
Ultimately, this research underscores the importance of libraries as central pillars of institutional excellence  
and their direct impact on student learning experiences, ensuring that HEIs are well-equipped to meet the  
evolving challenges of the academic landscape.  
LITERATURE CITED  
1. Akanwa, P., & Udo-anyanwu, A.J (2021). Personnel management in libraries. In Iheanacho, E.N. (Ed.),  
Organizational behaviour and contemporary issues in management (pp.407-419). Owerri: Career  
2. Alcober, L.F. (2002). Factors Affecting the Utilization of the Graduate Library Resources of the Leyte  
3. Ayyanar, S., Thirunavukkarasu, A., & Ramalingam, J. (2029). Impact of internet among library users in  
Alagappa  
Page 513  
University:  
A
case  
study.  
Retrieved  
from  
4. Brown, L., & James, T. (2024). Faculty-library collaboration in higher education: Best practices and  
strategies. Journal of Academic Libraries, 34 (1), 56-67.  
5. Commission on Higher Education (CHED). (2021). CHED Memorandum Order 22, Series of 2021.  
6. Chaputula, A.H., & Mutula, S.M. (2019). eReadiness of public university libraries in Malawi to use  
mobile phones in the provision of library and information services. Library Hi Tech. Retrieved from  
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322941957  
7. Chepkorir, E., Naibei, J.K., & Cheruiyot, J. (2019). Assessment of quality education in newly  
established public universities in Kenya: A case of University of Kabianga. International Journal of  
8. Dawadi, S., Shrestha, S., & Giri, R.A. (2021). Mixed Methods Research: A Discussion on its Types,  
9. Donovan, James. (2020). Keep the books on the shelves: Library space as intrinsic facilitator of the  
10. Gonzalez, M., & Ramirez, R. (2021). Aligning library collections with accreditation standards in higher  
education. Library Management, 42(3), 112-128  
11. Gupiyem, Gupiyem & Madueke, Victoria & Igboechesi, Gilbert & Amando, Anita. (2021). Academic  
Library Learning Space and Its Impact on Users: University of Jos Perspective. IOSR Journal of  
Research  
&
Method  
in  
Education  
(IOSRJRME).  
11.  
1-05.  
10.9790/7388-1103060105.  
12. Kwegyiriba, A., Aidoo, E., Agyemang, O., Mensah, R., & Enchill, Y. (2021). Significance of academic  
libraries in program me accreditation in technical universities in Ghana. Retrieved from:  
13. Hitt, G. (2024). Higher education challenges in library accreditation: A Philippine context. Journal of  
Education and Research.  
14. Jensen, P., & Howard, L. (2020). The role of libraries in curriculum development and accreditation  
compliance. Higher Education Review, 18(4), 134-148.  
15. Lim Li Min, S. & Casselden, B. (2021). A case study of Singapore management libraries: Adopting a  
mixed methods approach towards collection evaluation. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(3),  
16. Listor, E.T. (2024). Career Progression as Predictor on Job Satisfaction of Academic Librarians in the  
17. Obiano, D. (2021). The impact of collection development policy on the provision of library resources  
in  
academic  
libraries  
in  
Imo  
State,  
Nigeria.  
Retrieved  
18. Nkiko, C. (2021). University libraries in Africa: Challenges and opportunities in the digital era. Journal  
of Information Science.  
19. Nyakweba, I., Muwangu, J., & Sendikadiwa, E. (2020). Assessing the compliance of the Commission  
of University Education (CUE) standards for the library physical facilities at Rongo University Library,  
20. Parbe, Seth & Phuti, Rita & Barfi, Kwaku. (2021). Users’ Perception of Library Facilities: Evidence  
21. Udo-Anyanwu, A. J. (2021). Human resource development in libraries. Retrieved From  
22. Vannier, S., & Li, Y. (2023). Digital resource expansion in academic libraries: Meeting the needs of  
faculty and students. Journal of Educational Technology, 29(3), 234-247.  
23. Weng’ua, M., Rotich, D., & Kogos, A. (2019). The role of Kenyan universities in promoting research  
and scholarly publishing. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, 83(2). Retrieved  
24. Woods, K., & Turner, B. (2021). Library services for faculty: Increasing awareness and engagement.  
College & Research Libraries, 82(6), 672-684.  
Page 514